I.
Introduction: The Problem of Fragmentation (Disintegration)
In recent years we have been developing an
approach to social and economic transformation that builds on an integrated
perspective. Through this approach we aim to integrate the level of the
individual, the organization, and the society, as well as the four societal
(organizational) dimensions of:
• Nature (animate)• Culture (civic)• Politics
(public)• Economics (private/business)
[Source: The Practice of Transformation].
It is an approach that is equally rooted in the
four corners of our world (South, East, North and West) [Source: Four World
Approach], which means that we root our educational programs as well as the
transformational projects that go along with them, in their local context
before tapping into global knowledge. It is this development of an integrated
perspective (conceptually and practically) that we call genuine Social and
Economic Transformation.
We purposefully talk about transformation, not
about change. Take, as an illustration, the case of the butterfly. Here,
transformation is the process of a caterpillar transforming gradually into a
butterfly, arriving at a totally different stage. Change, to stay with this
metaphor, is the small caterpillar growing into a big one. We argue that mere
change -- a bigger caterpillar, as it were -- is not enough. Rather, we need to
work towards a new organizational and societal form, where the formerly
fragmented perspective of organization, self or society on the one hand, or the
sectoral fragmentation into either economics (private business), politics
(public), culture (civic) or nature (animate) on the other hand, is altogether
overcome.
All too often today there is a tendency to use the
terms economy and society as equivalent terms, in which case we overlook the
other equally important aspects of society, which are its environment (nature),
its culture (civic sector), its public (political) sector and, of course, its
economic (private) sector. This common oversight is a clear expression of how
far we have come in defining ourselves, our organizations and societies in
purely economic terms.
We are suffering from a fragmented perspective on
the world as a whole, where the West, at least in the past few hundred years,
took the lead. The result is totally unbalanced globalization that is dominated
mainly by the west and chiefly by economics. And we are painfully aware,
especially today, where we are missing out in relation to our environmental,
cultural and political dimensions. Samuel Huntington's Clash of
Civilizations is only one of the scenarios that seems to have become all
too true.
We have, up to now, been mainly building on case
studies of organizations based in the Middle East (e.g., Sekem, Egypt; source:
Abouleish, Sekem), the USA (VISA; source: Dee Hock, Chaordic Organization and
One From Many), South Africa (e.g. Cashbuild; source: Koopman), Bangladesh
(Grameen Bank; source: Yunus) and in Japan (Canon; source: Canon).
So far, we have not come across a major
organization in

The Daoist Principle of Yin and Yang is perhaps
the most powerful and well known example for a philosophical perspective that
aims to dynamically balance opposing forces. According to Daoism, the world is
made up of two energies: There is the male (Yang) and the female (Yin), the day
(Yang) and the night (Yin). These two energies are opposite forces but deeply
rely on each other.With Broad Air Conditioning we have identified a
powerful case of an organization that strives to stay in balance with its
different inner and outer dimensions, in an organizational (micro) context, and
in a societal (macro) context as well. It shows that if an organization builds
on its local wisdom and is rooted in local nature and culture, it can
contribute strongly to a sustainable development not only of its economy, but
to society as a whole.
It is time now to introduce our integrated
perspective on organizations in more depth before we turn to our case.

